Tuesday, November 10, 2009

New York State Must Cut Spending

gov.jpg
November 10, 2009

‘On the Brink,’ New York Must Cut, Paterson Says

ALBANY — Gov. David A. Paterson took the rare step on Monday of addressing a joint session of the Legislature during its traditional off-season and used the speech to underscore New York’s deepening financial crisis.

Mr. Paterson repeatedly used stark language to describe the gravity of the state’s economic health as he prodded lawmakers to make cuts he has proposed to programs long considered sacrosanct. “I will mortgage my political career on this plan,” Mr. Paterson told lawmakers as he warned that New York was rapidly running out of cash to meet its obligations.

"We stand on the brink of a financial challenge of unprecedented magnitude in the history of this state,” he added. “This is a historic moment. We’re going to have to make historic decisions.”

The state’s budget crisis and the negotiations between the governor and lawmakers over how to confront it have raised a fundamental question: Can New York, which is more generous in its social welfare programs than any other state, afford to continue to finance its expansive health care safety net and generous education spending?

New York spends $2,283 per capita on Medicaid, far more than any other state and twice the national average, according to statistics compiled by the state budget division. Second is Rhode Island, which spends $1,659. The state also spends $14,884 per pupil on school aid, more than any other state and well above the national average of $9,138.

Mr. Paterson’s speech came a day before lawmakers will reconvene for an extraordinary session called by the governor to take up his proposed budget cuts and potentially other issues, including legislation to legalize same-sex unions and overhaul the state’s public authorities.

A growing number of budget experts believe that New York can no longer afford to spend so much in the wake of the economic crisis, rising unemployment, the collapse of the stock market and the travails on Wall Street — the state’s main fiscal engine. While the state faces a deficit of more than $3 billion for the remaining four and a half months of this fiscal year, the greater worries among state officials are the unprecedented deficits the state faces in 2011 and 2012, after the expiration of federal stimulus financing and a temporary tax increase on the wealthy.

“We’re going to fall off a cliff unless we get our revenues and our expenditures in true sync,” said Lt. Gov. Richard Ravitch, the administration’s point man in budget negotiations with the Legislature.

He said that the state could no longer rely on its usual strategy of turning to an array of short-term solutions or ask more of the state’s taxpayers, adding, “We’re at the outer limits of the elasticity of our tax system.”

The governor’s budget director, Robert L. Megna, met with top legislative staff members Monday to discuss the state’s long-term prospects, and after listening to an hour of gloomy projections and data, he was not encouraged.

“I didn’t think it was possible,” he said, “but I’m more depressed than when I walked in.”

Education and health care advocates have angrily opposed proposed cuts to Medicaid and school financing, the two largest parts of the state’s budget, and the powerful labor unions that dominate debate in the capital are determined to fight them. They have a ready ally in Senate Democrats, who have balked at the governor’s proposed cuts, making the prospect of any deals to address the state’s long-term problems uncertain.

“Our goal all along has been to close the gap without burdening New York State residents with additional taxes or service cuts, and to turn back midyear reductions to education and health care services,” the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Carl Kruger, said in a statement Monday morning. He added in an interview Monday that cutting education “is never the answer.”

The Senate’s plan relies on so-called one-shots that would do little to change the state’s underlying financial situation. While the governor’s spending plan includes significant midyear cuts in school aid along with Medicaid cuts, the Senate plan relies far more heavily on raiding funds from public authorities and would increase New York’s debt burden by restructuring the state’s tobacco bonds.

The Senate is also proposing to expand the hours that gambling is allowed in the state.

“If that’s all they do tomorrow, it would be terribly irresponsible,” said Elizabeth Lynam, deputy research director at the Citizens Budget Commission, a nonprofit organization. “It’s 75 percent one-shots.”

Education advocates on Monday did not rule out waging another court battle against the state if cuts are made to education.

“We’re taking a look at things, we’re thinking about what the ramifications of all these things are,” said Geri Palast, the executive director of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, an educational advocacy group that in 2006 settled a long-running lawsuit with the state over the distribution of school aid, particularly in New York City.

Billy Easton, executive director of the Alliance for Quality Education, another advocacy group, said “school aid has to be off limits because of the constitutional obligations that are going unmet.”

But a number of prominent Democratic politicians with liberal records said that cuts to education and health care were inevitable.

“To do nothing is not a solution,” said Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, a Long Island Democrat and former assemblyman. “The only way to try to get ahead of it, which we haven’t done for many months now, is to deal with the cuts. Everything has to be on the table.”

The comptroller’s office numbers are more pessimistic than those from Mr. Paterson’s budget office. They project that the deficit for the remainder of the current fiscal year stands at $4.1 billion, with deficits of $7.8 billion and $15.7 billion in the succeeding years.

Mr. Ravitch, who helped steer New York City through its financial crisis in the 1970s, said, “The numbers are real and my own personal view is that they’re going to get worse.”


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, it looks like the time to move out of NYS is getting closer than ever. Residents of the state can no longer be the ones who have to pay more to keep the state afloat. Representatives have to stand up to teachers, public worker unions and say no. If not people are going to get disgusted and say What the hell! I hated snow anyway. Goodbye NY

who cares ? said...

most readers of these blogs are interested in local politics, folks,,

we have an interest in that circus in Albany but only really get involved enough to talk about the local circus.

Good info, but almost irrelevant to us,,, in my opinion, anyway -

look at the lack of responses,, NONE !!

Please stay local,, that is what many of us truly care about mainly because we are still deluded enough to think we can do something about it.

Anonymous said...

Thoughts...
Agree with poast.
Who Cares ? Your comments are wrong. State politics affect local politics.. the 2 are related.

I don't know if cutting spending is the answer. We've become addicted to all that money, and to disrupt the natural flow of the economy, which needs state aid like a dirty Henry Street dope fiend needs his/her fix, will only serve to drag our entire economy down into the crapper.

We have to invest in education, health care, small businesses, and infrastructure. Surely, we need to make governmental investments more accountable and efficient. Programs that do not work need to be cut, but cutting government is not the answer. We need to GROW Government to GROW our economy in NY.

Clearly, the Federal Government must do more. Our State is facing obscene defecits and the Feds have to supply us the money to close the gap. We are also going to have to raise taxes.

The key to fixing the problem is for the State and Federal Government to re-create a level playing field when it comes to a more global approach to business. To blame the decimation of our manufacturing base on high NY taxes is a myopic view.
the chinese government subsidizes their business so they can unfairly compete and destroy our businesses. It's time for protective tariffs. It's time for China to allow our products into their markets. The Obama administration needs to work towards this goal.

PMG