Monday, June 8, 2009

Republicans Seize Control of NYS Senate

The New York Times

June 8, 2009, 3:50 pm

Republicans Seize Control of State Senate

State Senate revolt
Rob Bennett for The New York Times; Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times
Two state senators — Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx and Hiram Monserrate of Queens — moved to defect to the Republican side, which would end Democratic control of the chamber.

Updated, 5:14 p.m. | ALBANY – Republicans seized control of the New York State Senate on Monday, in a stunning and sudden reversal of fortunes for the Democratic Party, which controlled the chamber for barely five months.

A raucous leadership fight erupted on the floor of the Senate around 3 p.m., with two Democrats, Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx and Hiram Monserrate of Queens, joining the 30 Senate Republicans in a motion that would displace Democrats as the party in control.

Dean G. Skelos
Giovanni Rufino for The New York Times
Senator Dean G. Skelos, a Long Island Republican, is expected to become the new majority leader.

It was a noisy and acrimonious scene on the floor of the Senate as Senator Thomas W. Libous, a Republican from Binghamton and the party’s deputy leader, shouted for a roll-call vote, while Democrats attempted to stall the vote by asking to adjourn the session.

All 30 Republicans stood with their hands raised, signaling a vote for a change in leadership. Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate joined them, each raising his hand. Republicans won the vote by a 32-to-30 margin. The Senate will now be governed under a new joint leadership structure, with Mr. Espada serving as the president pro tempore, and Senator Dean G. Skelos, of Long Island, as the new majority leader.

After the results of the vote were read aloud, the in-house television station that carries Senate proceedings live in the Capitol went dark. All that appeared on the screen was a still photo of the Senate chamber and the words “Please stand by.”

Senate Republicans quickly claimed that they were on the verge of controlling the chamber. “A new bipartisan, coalition is being established that is bringing real reform to the Senate right now,” Republicans said in a statement emailed to reporters at 3:20 p.m.

As the events were unfolding on the floor, Senator Malcolm A. Smith of Queens, leader of the Senate Democrats, huddled in the hall just off the Senate chamber and consulted with his staff. When asked what was occurring, he responded, “I’m trying to find out right now.”

At 4:44 p.m., Mr. Smith’s office released a statement insisting that control of the Senate had not changed hands.

“This was an illegal and unlawful attempt to gain control of the Senate and reverse the will of the people who voted for a Democratic majority,” Austin Shafran, a spokesman for Mr. Smith, said. “Nothing has changed. Senator Malcolm A. Smith remains the duly elected temporary president and majority leader. The real Senate majority is anxious to get back to governing, and will take immediate steps to get us back to work.”

In addition, Hank Sheinkopf, an adviser to Mr. Smith, denounced the senators behind the revolt.

“This is obviously an attempt by a couple of people to get personal power at the expense of the taxpayers,” Mr. Sheinkopf said. “It disrupts the Senate at a critical period, when issues like mayoral control are yet undecided. And the taxpayers are going to remember these guys by first and last name next year.”

Until January, Republicans had controlled the State Senate for more than four decades. Democrats won a majority of Senate seats in the November elections, but only after three dissident senators who were being courted by Republicans, including Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate, agreed to elect Mr. Smith.

Why Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate suddenly defected on Monday afternoon was not immediately clear. Both men are under investigation by the authorities. The state attorney general’s office is investigating a health care agency, Soundview HealthCare Network, that Mr. Espada ran until recently. And Mr. Monserrate, who was indicted on felony assault charges in March stemming from an attack on his companion, would automatically be thrown out of office if convicted.

If Mr. Monserrate is convicted, the Senate would be evenly split between the parties, 31 to 31. But with the lieutenant governor’s office vacant until the 2010 elections, there would be no tie-breaking vote in the chamber unless one or more other senators changed sides.

The coup could also complicate prospects for Gov. David A. Paterson, who is fighting to build a record on which to run for re-election and who requires a functioning Senate in order do so.

One source of contention among Democrats recently has been Mr. Smith’s support for same-sex marriage. Senator Rubén Díaz Sr., a Democrat from the Bronx, has been outspoken in his insistence that legislation allowing gay couples to marry not be allowed to come to a vote. Some had speculated he might leave the Democratic Party if Mr. Smith were to allow a vote.

But Mr. Díaz did not join Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate in the leadership vote on Monday. It was not immediately clear whether the same-sex marriage legislation played any role in the leadership dispute.

One person backing the revolt to put Republicans back in charge was Tom Golisano, the Rochester businessman and founder of Responsible New York, a political action committee that gave thousands of dollars to Senate Democrats last year to help them take control of the Senate, but who has become increasingly critical of the party. Mr. Golisano recently announced that he was moving his legal residence to Florida out of anger about the budget deal crafted in April by Democratic leaders in Albany, which included an increase in taxes on high earners.

Mr. Golisano played a role in negotiating original deal under which Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate — along with Mr. Díaz and Senator Carl Kruger of Brooklyn — gave their support to Mr. Smith. Steve Pigeon, his aide de camp, has been a frequent presence in Albany in recent weeks, and said Tuesday that Mr. Golisano felt betrayed by Mr. Smith because the Democratic leader had not delivered the overhaul of Senate rules he had promised upon taking power.

“He feels very strongly that he backed Malcolm Smith, and Smith didn’t keep his word, and didn’t make the changes he said he would,” Mr. Pigeon. “What you will see now is power-sharing, real reform.”

The apparent change of power sent shock waves in political circles across the state. At City Hall, in Lower Manhattan, stunned members of the New York City Council walked into the press room to watch the news unfold on local television. “I’m floored,” said Vincent M. Ignizio, a Republican city councilman and former state assemblyman from Staten Island.

To balance its budget for the next year, the City Council needs Albany to approve two proposed sales tax increases. “This will turn the budget process on its head,” Mr. Ignizio said.

Michael Barbaro and Nicholas Confessore contributed reporting from New York City.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I hope that the Republicans delivery the reforms needed in this state.

Anonymous said...

It wont last. The courts will reverse it.

Unknown said...

Yeah the courts will reverse it, than another court will reverse the reversal. More deals will be made, more committee posts and other positions will be sold. Basically look forward the NY State Legislature to continue in their long tradition of doing absolutely nothing.

Imre Beke, Jr. said...

Malcolm Smith is living in a dream world. This country and this State are representative democracies. We elect people to represent us and they have a certain term within which to do so. Nothing requires that they remain in a specific Party in order to do so nor that they vote with the Party in which they are registered, especially if they believe their Party of record is going in the wrong direction.

Democrats have celebrated such moves on the national level in the not so distant past. U.S. Senator Jim Jeffords's abandonment of the Republicna Party in 2001 giving the Democrats control of the Senate comes to mind, as does the recent jumpping ship of Penn. Sen. Arlen Specter. In neither case did Demcrats say that those gentlemen should stay Republicans.

There is a certain whiff of hypocrisy to spoil the fragrance of Spring here.

It boggles the mind that Malcolm Smith can claim to be the Majority Leader when the majority of the State Senate removed him. Nothing in the Senate's rules says that the majority PARTY chooses the Majority Leader, simply that a majority of sitting Senators must vote for him. He has failed to inspire loyalty in some of his own Senators choosing instead to bully and manipulate.

He has no one to blame but himself. His own lack of effectiveness and integrity brought about this situation.

Those of us who live outside the City - Democrats and Republicnas alike - should be ecstatic that this has happened. NYC Democrats control that Party as well as the Democrat contingencies within the two Houses. No upstate interest - Left or Right - is safe with a Demcrat controlled Legislature. People like Kevin Cahill are completely ineffective at representing our needs because they are so overwhelmed by the NYC steamroller.

This is not about Party versus Party. It's about NYC versus the rest of us.

Anonymous said...

One guy is on trial for smashing a glass in his girlfriends face and the other has been cast out by the Democrats for his shady dealings. The Republicans can have them. It will be good for the Democrats long term to get rid of scum like these guys and rebuild the Senate with a real Majority next time.
I am a Democrat and am not too upset by this. The timing could have been better, but the Senate was ineffective and somewhat chaotic under Smith. Plus, we get to purge the scum. On to 2010.

Anonymous said...

The REAL NEWS is that lowlife scum GUY KEMPE getting ARRESTED for DWI !!!

KARMA, anyone ???

i hope some Judge gives him serious jail time,, & not
" community service " !

He has damaged our collective communities enough.

BYE-BYE GUY !!!

Joe Bubel said...

Smith is a moron, and must consider the electorate a bunch of morons too. Doesn't that make you proud? In case he doesn't remember, the people do NOT elect the majority leader. The people elect their representitives in their district. If we each got a chance to vote on all 63 senators, perhaps he'd have something to stand on. Until then, our elected representitive votes for who THEY want as the Senate leader.

I don't think the courts have a say. NY Consitution has a little separation of powers/agencies clause.

Anonymous said...

If the Democrats have any integrity they will reject the Independence party line - bankrolled by Gallisano who orchestrated the Senate takeover. Thanks Independence Party - now we have another year of inaction! Don't credit the Republicans; follow the money.

Imre Beke, Jr. said...

How quickly the Democrats forget that Spitzer and Paterson tried to take over the NY State Senate by offering Executive Branch jobs to Republican Senators, some of whom took them. They were recruiting Republican Senators to leave the Senate, thereby trying to reduce the Republican Majority at the time to zero. That they were unsuccessful does not change the fact that they tried to do EXACTLY what Skelos and Golisano succeeded in doing.

Once again, we have evidence that the hypocrisy of the Democrats knows no bounds.